Friday, January 17, 2025

Manappuram Finance denies stake sale by promoter

Manappuram Finance Ltd. on Friday termed as speculative reviews.

 

 

Its promoter, V P Nandakumar, wants to promote his stake in the corporation or is on the verge of doing so.

The gold loan business enterprise, in a stock alternate statement, stated its management reiterates there’s no reality in the latest memories of a speculative nature performing inside the media to the impact that the employer’s promoter is trying to promote his stake inside the agency or is on the verge of doing so.

Earlier, reviews counseled that HDFC Bank, IDFC Bank, and Edelweiss Group had been in the race to shop for the Thrissur (Kerala) non-banking finance business enterprise.

As of March 2017, the enterprise had 4,148 branches across 27 states/UTs with belongings under management (AUM) of Rs. 13,723 crore and a workforce of 22,112. Over the last two years, the organization has varied into new commercial enterprise areas like microfinance, automobile and housing finance, and SME lending.

In February 2015, Manappuram Finance acquired Asirvad Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. With AUM a touch brief of Rs.300 crore. Overall, non-gold companies contributed 18.52, keeping with a cent of the overall business as of March 31, 2017. The NBFC stocks have been buying and selling down via 2.06, in line with the cent at Rs 116.35 at the BSE.

Structured trade finance (STF), a type of debt finance, is used as an alternative to conventional lending. This form of finance is utilized regularly in developing countries and cross-border transactions. The objective is to encourage trade by making use of non-standard security. STF is generally used in high-value transactions in bilateral trading relationships. As a more complicated type of finance, STF is commonly related to commodity trading.

Within the commodity sector, STF products are most prevalent. Producers, processors, traders, and end-users use it. Banking organizations tailor these financial arrangements to meet the precise needs of the clients. STF products are primarily working capital financing, warehouse financing, and pre-export financing. Some institutions extend reserve-based lending, finance the conversion of raw materials into products, and other customized finance products. To promote trading activities, STF products are spread across the supply chain.

Limited recourse trade finance lines sponsor STF structures. The structure aims to offer better security mechanisms and to enhance the borrower’s position when viewed in isolation.

How Have Technological Advancements Complemented STF?

Trade credit insurance, bank assurances, letters of credit, factoring, and forfeiting are some of the STF products positively affected by technological advancements. These products have changed due to the recent developments. The massive progress in communication and information domains has also helped banking institutions to track the physical risks and events in the supply chain between the exporter and the importer.

Why are STF Facilities Used?

denies

 

 

Structured trade finance products are used to mitigate the risks related to trading in a specific country and different jurisdictions. Any transaction together with STF products helps to add resilience to the trade, and the same cannot be said when looking at financing the individual elements of a business. Moreover, it allows for lengthening the payment time, strategizing procurement, diversifying funding, and enhancing the ability of clients to boost facility sizes.

STF is attractive because the borrower’s strength in the transaction is not scrutinized as closely as a vanilla loan. Here, the focus is more on the structure and the underlying cash flows. Another reason for STF’s popularity is that the transactions are not reflected in a company’s balance sheet, and this financing option has helped several importers maintain flexible credit terms with exporters.

In recent years, structured trade finance products coupled with recent technological advances are considered the fundamental reasons for the increasing volumes of international trade.

 

Invoice finance (IF) is not considered a credible source of finance among some business owners because of its relatively high cost and onerous terms. Is this perception justified? I will argue it is not with the introduction of single invoice finance.

What is an invoice that denies promoter sale finance?

It is the sale of a company’s sales ledger for cash, providing an ongoing source of money as invoices are issued to customers by the company. The company might retain the cash collection or transfer this and the associated credit risk to the funder.

Some conventional IF facilities can impose numerous fees, requiring security and a commitment from the company to sell its entire sales ledger to the finance company.

Some companies offer a refreshing financial alternative, offering to buy just a single invoice, charging as few as just one fee, and generally offering a more flexible funding alternative.

What is single invoice finance?

sale

 

As its name suggests, it is the purchase of one invoice for cash from a company. The company does not need to sell any further invoices, so companies can use single invoice finance to raise money as needed. Also, they might not need to provide security such as a debenture or a personal guarantee.

Single or multiple IFs are effective tools for cash management because they liquidate illiquid assets, i.e., convert debtors into cash. The cash realized can be reinvested by the company in profitable projects or used to pay back expensive debt.

Some borrowers might argue that on an annualized basis, invoice finance costs are higher than a conventional loan. That comparison is like comparing apples to oranges because the two financing instruments work differently. A loan is a continuous source of finance, whereas single invoice finance is discrete – providing finance for up to 90 days or less. Annualization of the invoice finance cost is inconsistent with its use.

Though the interest rate on a loan might look relatively attractive, the cost of arranging and administering it must also be factored in, such as the arrangement, commitment, non-utilization, exit fees, servicing exit fees, and documentation costs. There are documentation costs and recovery of bad debts or pay for credit protection. Invoice finance has its own arrangement and administration costs that might be more or less than a bank loan.

Invoice finance is, therefore, a credible alternative to a loan because:

  • It converts a company’s debtors into cash that may then be reinvested to potentially generate a positive return for the company.
  • The company can transfer debtor credit risk.
  • It avoids using up a bank’s limited credit capacity for the company and
  • diversifies its sources of funds, reducing its reliance on the banking sector.
  • companies can use it to raise cash as needed
  • security might not be needed

 

Jenna D. Norton
Jenna D. Norton
Creator. Amateur thinker. Hipster-friendly reader. Award-winning internet fanatic. Zombie practitioner. Web ninja. Coffee aficionado. Spent childhood investing in frisbees for the government. Gifted in exporting race cars in Orlando, FL. Had a brief career short selling psoriasis in Ohio. Earned praise for getting my feet wet with human growth hormone in Minneapolis, MN. Spent several years creating marketing channels for banjos for farmers. Spent 2002-2010 merchandising karma for no pay.

Latest news

Related news